Abstract
This chapter is a critical review of contemporary architectural practice in custodial design, using the cornerstone concept of critical prison design. The text is in three main sections. First, presenting the intrinsically problematic nature of prison design and relating it to the reference literature. Second, spelling out the implications of addressing prison design critically. Finally, discussing seven case studies, which, to a greater or lesser degree, successfully address critical prison design. In our view, engaging in critical prison design implies addressing three fundamental concerns. First, actively pursuing the visibility of current and visionary penitentiary realities through incorporating prison design into general design discourses. Second, using design to generate significant improvements in the living conditions of inmates, workers, and visitors. Third, problematising confinement and actively working towards decarceration. This last concern lends itself to two avenues of design-based research: innovative and experimental design proposals to challenge dominant views on detention; and a push for the adaptive reuse of existing custodial facilities, suggesting socially desirable uses for the prison’s heterotopic qualities. The chapter’s fundamental aim is to present the possibilities (and limitations) of architectural design as a critical practice, while actively contributing to a progressive debate on custodial spaces, institutions and practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See, for instance Amnesty International’s statement from November 19, 2019. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2019/11/spain-conviction-for-sedition-of-jordi-sanchez-and-jordi-cuixart-threatens-rights-to-freedom-of-expression-and-peaceful-assembly/.
- 2.
Koolhaas serves as one such notable exception, whose work is ‘constantly projecting new layers of “civilization” on old systems of supervision’ (Koolhaas, 1995: 241) and takes once again seriously the social responsibility of architecture, seemingly abandoned since high Modernism, adding a much-needed layer of uncertainty and irony.
- 3.
Not all designers fall into this camp though. May et al. (2014) is a good example of a very different approach to contemporary prison design.
References
Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception. Chicago University Press.
Bensimon, P. (2020). L’impact de l’architecture carcérale sur le personnel des prisons. Aix-en-Provence: Délinquance, justice et autres questions de société.
Binder, G., & Notterman, B. (2017). Penal incapacitation: A situationist critique. American Criminal Law Review, 54, 1.
Boucher, D., & Kelly, P. (1994). The social contract from Hobbes to Rawls (1st ed.). Routledge.
Brown, G. (2008). White man’s justice, Black man’s grief: Voting disenfranchisement and the failure of the social contract. Berkeley Journal of African American Law and Policy, 10, 287.
de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. University of California Press.
Consoli, G. G. (2005). Prescriptive versus non-prescriptive prison design briefs: Architect responses to interpreting Australian private prison design briefs. Facilities, 23(5/6), 216–225.
Consoli, G. (2006). The architect’s dilemma: A self reflection in understanding prison design and construction in private prison projects. Construction Economics and Building, 6(2), 1–10.
Craig, S. C. (2004). Rehabilitation versus control: An organizational theory of prison management. The Prison Journal, 84(4_suppl), 92S–114S.
Day, J. (2013). Corrections and collections: Architectures for art and crime. Routledge.
Dolovich, S. (2005). State punishment and private prisons. Duke Law Journal, 55, 437–546.
Easterling, K. (2014). Confined. In R. Paez (Ed.), Critical prison design (pp. 40–43). Actar.
Evans, R. (1982). The fabrication of virtue: English prison architecture, 1750–1840. Cambridge University Press.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
Garland, D. (1991). Sociological perspectives on punishment. Crime and Justice, 14, 115–165.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Anchor Books.
Gottschalk, M. (2016). Caught: The prison state and the lockdown of American politics. Princeton University Press.
Grant, E., & Jewkes, Y. (2015). Finally fit for purpose: The evolution of Australian prison architecture. The Prison Journal, 95(2), 223–243.
Grip, L., Caviezel, S, & Öjes E. (2018). How architecture and design matter for prison services: A rapid review of the literature. Kriminalvården.
Hannon, L. (2002). Criminal opportunity theory and the relationship between poverty and property crime. Sociological Spectrum, 22(3), 363–381.
Ignatieff, M. (1978). A just measure of pain: The penitentiary in the industrial revolution, 1780–1850. Pantheon Books.
Jewkes, Y., & Johnston, H. (2012). The evolution of prison architecture. In Handbook on prisons (pp. 204–226). Routledge.
Jewkes, Y., & Moran, D. (2017). Prison architecture and design: Perspectives from criminology and carceral geography. In A. Liebling, S. Maruna, & L. McAra (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Criminology (pp. 541–561). Oxford University Press.
Koolhaas, R. (1995). Revision. In R. Koolhaas & B. Mau, S, M, L, XL. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, pp. 235–253.
Lawston, J. M., & Meiners, E. R. (2014). Ending our expertise: Feminists, scholarship, and prison abolition. Feminist Formations, 1–25.
Leshem, R., & Weisburd, D. (2019). Epigenetics and hot spots of crime: Rethinking the relationship between genetics and criminal behavior. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 35(2), 186–204.
Matter Architecture, Bernheimer, L., O’Brien, R., & Barnes, R. (2017). Wellbeing in prison design: A guide, viewed 15 April 2020. http://bit.ly/MatterPrisonWellbeingV1
May, K., Hout, J. van den Reidel, J., Coates, A. L. IV & Franklin, J. (Eds.). (2014). CLOG: Prisons. CLOG.
Murtagh, N., Roberts, A., & Hind, R. (2016). The relationship between motivations of architectural designers and environmentally sustainable construction design. Construction Management and Economics, 34(1), 61–75.
McLeod, A. M. (2015). Prison abolition and grounded justice. UCLA Law Review, 62, 1156.
Moran, D. (2015). Carceral geography: Spaces and practices of incarceration. Ashgate Publishing.
Moran, D., Jewkes Y., & Lorne, C. (2019). Design for imprisonment: Architectural ethics and prison design. Architecture Philosophy, 4(1), 67–82.
Paez, R. (2014) Critical prison design. Actar.
Pare, P. P., & Felson, R. (2014). Income inequality, poverty and crime across nations. The British Journal of Sociology, 65(3), 434–458.
Phelps, M. S. (2011). Rehabilitation in the punitive era: The gap between rhetoric and reality in US prison programs. Law & Society Review, 45(1), 33–68.
Porter, N. D. (2016) Repurposing new beginnings for closed prisons. The Sentencing Project, viewed 15 August 2020. https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/repurposing-new-beginnings-closed-prisons/
Preuss, S. (2010). Ten incredible repurposed prisons. Recycle Nation, viewed 15 August 2020. https://recyclenation.com/2010/10/recycling-repurposed-prisons/
Rothman, D. J. (1971). The discovery of the Asylum: Social order and disorder in the New Republic. Little, Brown and Company.
Rousseau, J. J. (1999). Discourse on the origin of inequality. Oxford University Press. (Original published in 1755).
Sang, K., Ison, S., Dainty, A., & Powell, A. (2009). Anticipatory socialisation amongst architects: A qualitative examination. Education+ Training, 51(4), 309–321.
Santo, A. (2015) Converted Cellblocks. The Marshall Project, viewed 15 August 2020. https://www.themarshallproject.org/2015/01/29/converted-cellblocks
Sperry, R., Bierbaum, A., Calaf, J., Kearney, K., and Monroe, K. (2005, November). Prison design Boycott: A challenge to the professional business of incarceration. Prison Legal News.: 1.
St. John, V. J., & Blount-Hill, K. (2019). Place, space, race, and life during and after incarceration: Dismantling mass incarceration through spatial and placial justice. Harvard Kennedy School Journal of African American Policy, 2018–19, 46–54.
Sundt, J. L., Dammer, H. R., & Cullen, F. T. (2002). The role of the prison chaplain in rehabilitation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 35(3–4), 59–86.
Szuta, A. F., & Szczepański, J. (2019). The difficult heritage. The reuse of former prison buildings. Technical Transactions, 8, 71–82.
Vessella, L. (2017). Prison, architecture and social growth: Prison as an active component of the contemporary city. The Plan Journal, 2(1), 63–84.
Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Duke University Press.
Wacquant, L. (2012). The punitive regulation of poverty in the neoliberal age. Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, Num., 89, 38–40.
Wemmers, J. A., Cyr, K., Chamberland, C., Lessard, G., Collin-Vézina, D., & Clement, M. E. (2018). From victimization to criminalization: General strain theory and the relationship between poly-victimization and delinquency. Victims & Offenders, 13(4), 542–557.
Wilcox, P., & Cullen, F. T. (2018). Situational opportunity theories of crime. Annual Review of Criminology, 1, 123–148.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paez, R., with Kwan-Lamar Blount-Hill. (2023). Prison Design: Between Pragmatic Engagement and the Dream of Decarceration. In: Moran, D., Jewkes, Y., Blount-Hill, KL., St. John, V. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Design. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11972-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11972-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11971-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11972-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)