HP-Compaq TC1100 Tablet

Tablet PC Resources:

Software-Related:
Tablet PC Utilities and Buttons
Drivers* (Note HP page is slow. Windows XP drivers ARE compatible with Windows 7, unknown for 8 & 10)

Guide to RMClock/SpeedFan: As part of "Is my Tablet too Hot?"
<- Possibly during 2016/7 this will "come online"

Hardware-Related:
Accessing the Inside of the Tablet - YouTube Video* OR HP-Compaq Factory Literature*
What Function does this Serve?

Tablet-PC Support Groups:
Starred (*) items are linked to EXTERNAL web-resources, and are in no way affiliated with this site. Proceed at your own risk
Tablet-PC Forums* (HP/Compaq Subsect*)
HP TC1100 "Tablet Wiki" Page* (Sign the TC1100 Petition HERE!*)
HP TC1000 "Tablet Wiki" Page* (Page is incomplete)
My HP-Compaq TC1100 Tablet

Navigation:
Home -> Features Index -> YOU ARE HERE {"HP-Compaq TC1100"}



The TC1100 arose out of the need to further develop the Compaq TC1000. You'll find information about my TC1100 in the resources links above


The Compaq TC1000 was released around late 2002 by what was the Compaq Computer Corporation.
The machine cost a small fortune for a portable computer, although was "about right" for a machine in what was the ultraportable bracket. You could probably pick on of these up for about $3K 'back in the day.'

Even for the price, you didn't get all that much in terms of hardware capability. You got a Transmeta Crusoe TM5800 running at just 1GHz with the VIA chipset. Being a "generic" CPU might have increased battery life and cut costs for Compaq, but certainly couldn't compete in terms of performance. This processor cannot even compare to a Pentium 3 in perforance.
Graphics was provided by a nVidia Geforce2GO graphics chip, it is of the PCI type, with 16mb of VRAM. This at least eliminates "RAM Robbing" from integrated graphics. Last but not least, you got a 20GB hard-drive.
Extenal connectivity on this model, as well as the TC1100, were quite good. Provided were 2x USB 1.1 Ports, 1 56k Dial-up Modem Port, 10/100 Intel Ethernet, 802.11b (Intel or Atheros) wireless (same bus as modem), Bluetooth 1.1, 1 VGA port, TI PCI1520 Cardbus and CompactFlash slot.

Screen size was 10.4", perfect for a machine of this size. The machine isn't too wide/tall, and is "just right" in terms of handling in tablet or slate modes. In comparison, today's models incorporate "Widescreens," which make handling in the portrait orientation tedious, to say the least.

Exactly how did Compaq create a tablet design here? Well, they incorporated a snap-on keyboard with a 180° swivel (or "Lazy-Susan") base, allowing the keyboard to be effortlessly folded away. Additionally, a slider controlling two extendable "locks" helps secure the display in place when the keyboard is folded away. Mine had these pinds, but both broke during a loss between Gravity and the TC1100, (Superglue does work, but not not be a lasting solution, in this case).
Not only did you have a swivel base, the keyboard was also removable, via a small latch on the machine's backside. This transforms the tablet into a "slate," which can be used in Portrait or Landscape orientation.

                                                   

At present, I am unware of the touch-digitizer that was used by Compaq in this machine. What I do know, and wish to warn you about, is the touch-pen input on this PC. Unfortunately, in order to operate, you need either 1 or 2 AAAA batteries to operate the RF device within the pen.
These batteries aren't all that easy to find these days either, and probably cost another small fortune. No doubt this frustrated many tablet users - the extreme cost, scarcity of the product and the effort required to even get at the batteries probably caused several "Hammer vs. PC" incidents over the lifespan of these machines.
Even today, some of the tablet's I've seen (Such as the new Sony Flip-Screen machines) use these stupid RF pens with AAAA batteries. I think this is a huge mistake. Let's boycott machines that have this design, shall we?

Compaq also designed the machine with usability in mind, and as such included several commonly-used buttons on the machine. Another page outlining these exist below.

Today, The TC1000 is largely redundant, having been succeeded by newer and faster tablets capable of much, much more.
However, the machines are still the only to date that utilise the Swivel & Detach keyboard base, which in my eyes is a real winner. Even though they are woefully outdated, the design is still a winner in my eyes. You can sign a petition to bring back the TC-Tablet design down below... 

Well, around late 2003, after Compaq is bought by HP, an evolution of the TC1000 design is offered, with the moniker "TC1100." The machine now carries some HP branding, although the machine is still officially known as a "Compaq TC1100." Because of this, several parts are now labelled with both HP and Compaq part numbers, and potential servicers (or servicees) are requested to "Replace with HP spares."
In any case, the TC1100 got some nice hardware upgrades, with some nice new features to address concerns over performance and usability:
I personally have the 2004 TC1100 tablet. I believe I've ended up with the "loaded" model - top of the range in its day. Even the lowly models are still winners in portability.
If you feel inspired to get a TC-series machine after reading this - here's my suggestion: Please AVOID the TC1000 AT ALL COSTS!
Even a TC1100 with a Celeron processor is likely to give better performance than the Transmeta-Crusoe processor. In either case, don't expect to run Windows Vista or newer on any machine except the Pentium-M = or > 1.0GHz.

Some resources I consider useful for those stalwarts with the mighty TC1100 (and TC1000 to a far lesser extent) are linked at the top of this page.
Back in 2014 when this resource first came into fruition, I considered hosting drivers for this machine. I decided not to, particularly because of legal reasons, but also because my internet connection has very slow (maximum 100kb/sec) upload speeds, typical a fifth of that compared to what I can upload files from a normal computer. I assume my ISP throttles connections from Port 80 to prevent illegal content distribution.